SAES-SVD: Self-Adaptive Suppression of Accumulated and Local Errors for SVD-based LLM Compression
Xing Hu, Dawei Yang, Yuan Cheng, Zhixuan Chen, Zukang Xu

TL;DR
SAES-SVD introduces a novel LLM compression framework that jointly optimizes intra-layer reconstruction and inter-layer error compensation, effectively reducing error propagation and improving performance without fine-tuning.
Contribution
It proposes a self-adaptive, joint optimization approach for SVD-based LLM compression, explicitly addressing error accumulation and enhancing compression effectiveness.
Findings
Consistently improves post-compression performance across multiple LLMs.
Does not require fine-tuning or mixed-rank strategies.
Effectively suppresses accumulated errors during compression.
Abstract
The rapid growth in the parameter scale of large language models (LLMs) has created a high demand for efficient compression techniques. As a hardware-agnostic and highly compatible technique, low-rank compression has been widely adopted. However, existing methods typically compress each layer independently by minimizing per-layer reconstruction error, overlooking a critical limitation: the reconstruction error propagates and accumulates through the network, which leads to amplified global deviations from the full-precision baseline. To address this, we propose Self-Adaptive Error Suppression SVD (SAES-SVD), a LLMs compression framework that jointly optimizes intra-layer reconstruction and inter-layer error compensation. SAES-SVD is composed of two novel components: (1) Cumulative Error-Aware Layer Compression (CEALC), which formulates the compression objective as a combination of local…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
1. **Theoretically grounded approach**: The derivation of closed-form solutions based on second-order activation statistics provides a principled mathematical foundation. The formulation that combines local reconstruction with weighted cumulative error compensation is elegant and well-motivated. 2. **Adaptive mechanism**: The ACES component that automatically adjusts weighting coefficients is a practical contribution that removes the need for manual hyperparameter tuning across different layers
1. **Outdated evaluation benchmarks**: The datasets used for evaluation appear to be somewhat dated. Modern LLM compression research should include more challenging and recent benchmarks that better reflect current application demands and model capabilities. 2. **Limited model coverage**: The experiments focus primarily on medium-sized models like LLaMA-7B. To demonstrate the method's generalizability and practical value, 3. **Insufficient baseline comparisons**: The paper should compare against
1. Compelling motivation on cumulative error. The paper identifies a real pain point in SVD compression for LLMs, cumulative cross-layer error during inference—and directly targets it. The motivation is well supported by the empirical evidence in Figure 1, which demonstrates the phenomenon clearly. 2. Solid theoretical underpinnings (CEALC & ACES). Both components—CEALC and ACES—come with clear formulations and derivations. The overall approach is coherent: the objective design is principled, a
1. Theoretical limitations and missing robustness analyses. The fixed-subspace approximation used by ACES may break down under small spectral gaps or large perturbations. The current mitigation (β caps and shrinkage) is largely engineering-based. The paper would benefit from robustness curves bucketed by spectral gap, as well as a deeper theoretical justification for using RER and an explicit discussion of how RER improvements translate to final PPL. 2. Limited architectural diversity in exper
- Adequate experiments and compelling results: - The experiments are comprehensive, covering multiple models and scales. The results are compelling, consistently outperforming strong SVD baselines (even those requiring fine-tuning), which effectively highlights the method's superiority. - Systematic and interpretable methods: - The proposed method is theoretically sound and well-motivated. It systematically addresses the error accumulation problem, and the ACES component provides an elegant,
- Lack of computational complexity and time analysis: The paper does not provide a detailed evaluation of the computational overhead during the compression process. The time cost of statistics collection and ACES optimization, relative to baseline methods, is not quantified precisely. - Limited comparison beyond SVD-based approaches: The evaluation focuses only on SVD-based baselines. It remains unclear whether the proposed method would still outperform non–SVD-based compression methods under
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Speech Recognition and Synthesis · Topic Modeling
