Categoricity for an inferential $\omega$-logic and in $L_{\omega_1,\omega}$
John T. Baldwin, Constantin C. Br\^incu\c{s}

TL;DR
This paper extends first-order logic with $$-rules, characterizing structures where theories are categorical, and shows how certain logics define the same classes of structures as first-order theories with specific rules.
Contribution
It introduces two extensions of first-order logic with $$-rules, demonstrating their categoricity properties and equivalences to first-order theories with $G-$-rules.
Findings
Robinson's system Q and Peano Arithmetic become categorical in the one-sorted inferential $$-logic.
Each complete $L_{,}$ sentence defines the same class of structures as a first-order theory with a $G-$-rule.
The inferential rules for these logics are shown to be categorical, determining truth-conditions uniquely.
Abstract
This paper provides two extensions of first order logic by `-rules'. In each case we characterize the countable structures whose theory in the logic is categorical (has a unique model). In the one-sorted inferential -logic, both Robinson's system and Peano Arithmetic become categorical. In the two-sorted generalized -logic we show each complete sentence defines the same class of structures as a first-order theory with the appropriate -rule. The results depend on proving that the inferential rules for the logics are categorical, i.e. they uniquely determine certain truth-conditions for the logical connectives and quantifiers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
