Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal

TL;DR

This paper critically reevaluates the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal using the gravitational path integral, revealing that probabilities for closed universes are nearly certain, and explores a statistical interpretation that simplifies amplitude calculations.

Contribution

It introduces a consistent method for evaluating the no-boundary proposal via the gravitational path integral, clarifying probability predictions and proposing a statistical interpretation.

Findings

Probability for any closed universe is nearly 1 or exactly 1.

States in the GPI Hilbert space are nearly parallel to the Hartle-Hawking state.

All amplitudes are exactly 1 under the statistical interpretation.

Abstract

We revisit the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary proposal. To extract probabilities, one must use the gravitational path integral (GPI) to compute not only the no-boundary amplitude, but also the norms by which its square is divided. We find that this dramatically alters predictions: the probability for any closed universe is either nearly 1, or exactly 1. That is, in the Hilbert space of closed universes defined by the GPI, the states of interest in cosmology are all nearly parallel to the Hartle-Hawking state up to nonperturbative corrections in $G_N^{-1}$. We also consider a statistical interpretation of the GPI, as an average of arbitrary products of amplitudes. We find that all amplitudes are exactly 1 in this case, consistent with recent arguments that the statistical approach to the GPI with a closed boundary computes an average over one-dimensional Hilbert spaces. As an example, we illustrate the consistent evaluation of the no-boundary proposal in inflationary cosmology.