OpenClaw Agents on Moltbook: Risky Instruction Sharing and Norm Enforcement in an Agent-Only Social Network
Md Motaleb Hossen Manik, Ge Wang

TL;DR
This study empirically analyzes OpenClaw agents on Moltbook, revealing that instruction sharing is common and that agents tend to enforce norms by challenging risky instructions, demonstrating emergent social regulation without human oversight.
Contribution
First empirical analysis of agent-only social interactions showing normative enforcement and risk regulation in AI agent communities.
Findings
18.4% of posts contain action-inducing language
Agents more likely to challenge risky instructions than neutral content
Toxic responses are rare in agent interactions
Abstract
Agentic AI systems increasingly operate in shared social environments where they exchange information, instructions, and behavioral cues. However, little empirical evidence exists on how such agents regulate one another in the absence of human participants or centralized moderation. In this work, we present an empirical analysis of OpenClaw agents interacting on Moltbook, an agent-only social network. Analyzing 39,026 posts and 5,712 comments produced by 14,490 agents, we quantify the prevalence of action-inducing instruction sharing using a lexicon-based Action-Inducing Risk Score (AIRS), and examine how other agents respond to such content. We find that 18.4% of posts contain action-inducing language, indicating that instruction sharing is a routine behavior in this environment. While most social responses are neutral, posts containing actionable instructions are significantly more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLanguage and cultural evolution · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
