Measuring Individual User Fairness with User Similarity and Effectiveness Disparity
Theresia Veronika Rampisela, Maria Maistro, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Christina Lioma

TL;DR
This paper introduces PUF, a novel evaluation measure for individual user fairness in recommender systems that simultaneously considers user similarity and effectiveness disparity, addressing limitations of existing measures.
Contribution
The paper presents PUF, the first measure to jointly evaluate user similarity and effectiveness disparity in individual fairness, validated across multiple datasets and rankers.
Findings
PUF consistently captures both user similarity and effectiveness disparity.
Existing measures are insensitive to at least one aspect of fairness.
PUF outperforms other measures in robustness and comprehensiveness.
Abstract
Individual user fairness is commonly understood as treating similar users similarly. In Recommender Systems (RSs), several evaluation measures exist for quantifying individual user fairness. These measures evaluate fairness via either: (i) the disparity in RS effectiveness scores regardless of user similarity, or (ii) the disparity in items recommended to similar users regardless of item relevance. Both disparity in recommendation effectiveness and user similarity are very important in fairness, yet no existing individual user fairness measure simultaneously accounts for both. In brief, current user fairness evaluation measures implement a largely incomplete definition of fairness. To fill this gap, we present Pairwise User unFairness (PUF), a novel evaluation measure of individual user fairness that considers both effectiveness disparity and user similarity. PUF is the only measure…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRecommender Systems and Techniques · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
