Categories and functors of universal algebraic geometry. Automorphic equivalence of algebras
A. Tsurkov

TL;DR
This paper explores the categorical framework of universal algebraic geometry, defining automorphic equivalence of algebras through category isomorphisms, and refines existing concepts with more elegant categorical definitions.
Contribution
It provides a new, more elegant categorical definition of automorphic equivalence of algebras and revisits related theorems in this context.
Findings
Categorical definition of automorphic equivalence refined
Theorems related to algebraic geometry categories revisited
Enhanced understanding of algebraic geometry in universal algebra
Abstract
Universal algebraic geometry allows considering of geometric properties of every universal algebra. When two algebras have same algebraic geometry? We must consider the categories of algebraic closed sets of these algebras to answer this question. The complete coincidence of these categories gives us a concept of the geometric equivalence of algebras. Some type of isomorphisms of these categories gives us a concept of the automorphic equivalence of algebras. This concept has been considered since article B. Plotkin, Algebras with the same (algebraic) geometry. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics. 242 (2003), 17--207. DOI: 10.1134/S0081543812070048. We will give by language of category theory one more elegant definition of this concept and recall some theorems related to this concept.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
