Beyond Hurwicz: Incentive Compatibility under Informational Decentralization
David Lancashire

TL;DR
This paper explores incentive compatibility in decentralized information settings, showing traditional mechanisms are impossible but proposing a new class of indirect, parallel game mechanisms that can enforce incentives.
Contribution
It introduces a novel class of non-revelation-equivalent mechanisms that maintain incentive compatibility through indirect preference inference in decentralized environments.
Findings
Revelation-based mechanisms are generally impossible under decentralization.
A new class of mechanisms using parallel, uncorrelatable games can sustain enforcement.
These mechanisms enable incentive compatibility beyond traditional approaches.
Abstract
Achieving incentive compatibility under informational decentralization is impossible within the class of direct and revelation-equivalent mechanisms typically studied in economics and computer science. We show that these impossibility results are conditional by identifying a narrow class of non-revelation-equivalent mechanisms that sustain enforcement by inferring preferences indirectly through parallel, uncorrelatable games.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Game Theory and Applications
