FinEvo: From Isolated Backtests to Ecological Market Games for Multi-Agent Financial Strategy Evolution
Mingxi Zou, Jiaxiang Chen, Aotian Luo, Jingyi Dai, Chi Zhang, Dongning Sun, Zenglin Xu

TL;DR
FinEvo introduces an ecological game framework for modeling and analyzing the evolutionary dynamics of multi-agent financial strategies, incorporating adaptive learning and market interactions to better understand strategy success and market behavior.
Contribution
It presents a novel ecological game formalism that models strategy evolution in financial markets, integrating learning dynamics and market interactions for comprehensive analysis.
Findings
Strategies can dominate, collapse, or form coalitions depending on competitors.
FiniteEvo is stable and reproducible in experiments.
Reveals context-dependent outcomes unseen in static backtests.
Abstract
Conventional financial strategy evaluation relies on isolated backtests in static environments. Such evaluations assess each policy independently, overlook correlations and interactions, and fail to explain why strategies ultimately persist or vanish in evolving markets. We shift to an ecological perspective, where trading strategies are modeled as adaptive agents that interact and learn within a shared market. Instead of proposing a new strategy, we present FinEvo, an ecological game formalism for studying the evolutionary dynamics of multi-agent financial strategies. At the individual level, heterogeneous ML-based traders-rule-based, deep learning, reinforcement learning, and large language model (LLM) agents-adapt using signals such as historical prices and external news. At the population level, strategy distributions evolve through three designed mechanisms-selection, innovation,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. Significance of the Contribution: This paper offers a significant improvement over traditional, isolated strategy backtesting by proposing a comprehensive evolutionary framework. This framework is designed to study strategy interaction and evolution across diverse market environments. 2. Rigorous Theoretical Framework: The paper introduces a set of strategy evolution equations built upon a rigorous mathematical foundation. These equations decompose market dynamics into three interpretable co
1. Limited Scope of the Evolutionary Framework: While the framework is presented with rigorous definitions, its evolutionary mechanism is predominantly payoff-driven. This approach overlooks micro-level strategy propagation dynamics (such as diffusion through adjacent nodes). Furthermore, the study confines its analysis to competition among a fixed set of predefined strategies, rather than employing methods like genetic algorithms to evolve new, and potentially superior, hybrid strategies. 2. O
* A theoretically grounded ecological modeling framework for financial markets and agent-based traders. * Experimentation across synthetic and empirical environments. * Integration of game theory, RL, agent models and ecosystem dynamics * Some potentially interesting observations, especially about system shocks
* arbitrary choice of SDEs governing the ecology of the simulations * hyperparameter choices not validated, so may need excessive tuning * empirical validity questionable * economic meaning and usefulness questionable * alternate approaches not baselined * baselining against other methods tested not in terms of financially meaningful metrics * overrelience on synthetic scenarios
- The market dynamic is clearly formalised - The population evolution is explicit - A range of simulations and ablations are provided under varying market conditions (bull vs bear) and scenarios
On the formalism - [Uncorrelated] The assumption of uncorrelated payoffs and environment shocks is quite fundamental to all the closed forms provided. However, in realistic scenarios, this is unlikely to be the case. Having the derivations for the limiting case of uncorrelated is okay, but showing something in the correlated case would be more useful. - [Normal] Environment shocks are assumed to be normally distributed. - [Latent params] The formalism relies on knowing N (number of traders) and
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Stock Market Forecasting Methods · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
