
TL;DR
This paper explores extending various graph definitions from groups to general algebras, analyzing which properties carry over and introducing new directed and simplicial complex structures.
Contribution
It systematically investigates how existing algebraic graphs can be generalized to arbitrary algebras, including directed graphs and simplicial complexes, highlighting challenges and extensions.
Findings
Some group-based graph properties extend to algebras unchanged
Certain graphs require specific group properties to generalize
Explicit descriptions provided for independence algebras
Abstract
There has been a great deal of attention recently to graphs whose vertex set is a group, defined using the group structure. (The commuting graph, where two elements are joined if they commute, is the oldest and most famous example.) The purpose of this paper is to investigate extending the definitions of such graphs to general algebras (in the sense of universal algebra). It seems unlikely that such a definition can be made for the commuting graph, or for various others such as the nilpotency and Engel graphs. However, for graphs whose definition depends on the notion of subgroup or subalgebra generated by a subset, the existing definitions work without change. These graphs include several well-studied examples: the power graph, enhanced power graph, generating graph, independence graph, and rank graph. In these cases, some results about groups extend to arbitrary algebras unchanged,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Finite Group Theory Research
