Strong Linear Baselines Strike Back: Closed-Form Linear Models as Gaussian Process Conditional Density Estimators for TSAD
Aleksandr Yugay, Hang Cui, Changhua Pei, Alexey Zaytsev

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that simple linear autoregressive models with closed-form solutions can match or outperform complex deep neural networks in time series anomaly detection, offering a more efficient alternative.
Contribution
It introduces a closed-form linear model for TSAD that captures various anomaly types and achieves superior accuracy with less computational cost.
Findings
Linear models match or outperform deep detectors.
Proposed approach is computationally efficient.
Linear models effectively capture diverse anomalies.
Abstract
Research in time series anomaly detection (TSAD) has largely focused on developing increasingly sophisticated, hard-to-train, and expensive-to-infer neural architectures. We revisit this paradigm and show that a simple linear autoregressive anomaly score with the closed-form solution provided by ordinary least squares (OLS) regression consistently matches or outperforms state-of-the-art deep detectors. From a theoretical perspective, we show that linear models capture a broad class of anomaly types, estimating a finite-history Gaussian process conditional density. From a practical side, across extensive univariate and multivariate benchmarks, the proposed approach achieves superior accuracy while requiring orders of magnitude fewer computational resources. Thus, future research should consistently include strong linear baselines and, more importantly, develop new benchmarks with richer…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
