The Fourth HAWC Catalog of Very-High-Energy Gamma-Ray Sources

TL;DR

This paper presents an updated catalog of very-high-energy gamma-ray sources from the HAWC Observatory, utilizing improved data, modeling, and analysis techniques to identify and characterize gamma-ray sources with enhanced accuracy.

Contribution

The paper introduces a systematic multi-source fitting framework and improved modeling of source morphology and spectral parameters for the HAWC gamma-ray catalog.

Findings

85 sources detected at 4σ significance

11 sources without TeVCat counterparts

22 sources without 1LHAASO counterparts

Abstract

We present an updated catalog of TeV gamma-ray sources based on the fifth pass of data from the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) Observatory. This release benefits from improved event reconstruction and nearly three additional years of observations. It also incorporates a systematic multi-source fitting framework, enabling more flexible and accurate modeling of the gamma-ray sky. This fitting procedure was modeled after the manual approach used in HAWC analyses of individual sources and regions, as well as other gamma-ray catalogs, like the 4FGL. In addition to more varied modeling of source morphology and spectral parameters compared to previous HAWC catalogs, this catalog uses a robust modeling of Galactic diffuse TeV emission. The fitting procedure uses both point-like and symmetric Gaussian spatial templates to model the source morphology. The spectral shape of the emission is modeled with either a simple power-law or log-parabola to explore curvature in the spectral energy distribution. We report 85 sources at the 4{\sigma} level, including 11 sources not associated with any TeVCat source using a distance-based association criterion. Distance-based association with the 1LHAASO catalog results in 22 4HWC sources without a counterpart. Additionally, there are 12 sources not associated with any physical counterpart in the Low- or High-Mass X-Ray Binary, the ATNF, or Fermi Pulsar, or SNR catalogs of sources. Five of the aforementioned sources have no counterpart in any of the catalogs searched and represent an opportunity for follow-up observations.