Human versus Artificial Inteligence; a significant example in astrophysics, alas
A. De R\'ujula

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates an experiment where an AI compares two models of gamma ray bursts, aiming to assess the objectivity and effectiveness of AI in scientific model evaluation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach of using AI to compare scientific models, reducing human bias in model assessment.
Findings
AI provided an impartial comparison of the models.
The experiment showcases AI's potential in scientific analysis.
Results suggest AI can assist in objective scientific evaluations.
Abstract
There are two well documented models of gamma ray bursts (GRBs), the "Standard' model and the "Cannonball" model. They have often been reviewed [1] and sometimes compared [2]. Here, to avoid understandable biases, I show below the results of an experiment: letting an AI compare the data and the two models. All of what follows (but two references, two footnotes and the next sentence) is the result of asking Perplexity.ai to perform this confrontational task. It should be easy for an impartial reader to reach very clear conclusions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
