Class choice and the surprising weakness of Kelley-Morse set theory
Victoria Gitman, Joel David Hamkins, Thomas A. Johnstone

TL;DR
This paper reveals that Kelley-Morse set theory (KM) is weaker than commonly believed, lacking several principles like class choice and Łoś theorem, but these can be recovered by augmenting KM with the class choice scheme to form KM+.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates the limitations of KM and introduces KM+ as a stronger, more robust second-order set theory by adding the class choice scheme.
Findings
KM does not prove the class choice scheme.
KM fails Łoś theorem for internal ultrapowers.
KM does not preserve $oldsymbol{orall ext{quantifier invariance}}$ for $oldsymbol{ ext{Σ}^1_n}$ formulas.
Abstract
Kelley-Morse set theory KM is weaker than generally supposed and fails to prove several principles that may be desirable in a foundational second-order set theory. Even though KM includes the global choice principle, for example, (i) KM does not prove the class choice scheme, asserting that whenever every set admits a class with , then there is a class for which on every section. This scheme can fail with KM even in low-complexity first-order instances and even when only a set of indices are relevant. For closely related reasons, (ii) the theory KM does not prove the {\L}o\'s theorem scheme for internal second-order ultrapowers, even for large cardinal ultrapowers, such as the ultrapower by a normal measure on a measurable cardinal. Indeed, the theory KM itself is not generally preserved by internal ultrapowers.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
