Quantifying Model Uniqueness in Heterogeneous AI Ecosystems
Lei You

TL;DR
This paper introduces a statistical framework for auditing the uniqueness of models within heterogeneous AI ecosystems, using interventions to distinguish genuine novelty from redundancy, and demonstrates its effectiveness across various AI domains.
Contribution
The paper develops a novel intervention-based auditing method, PIER, and establishes theoretical limits and optimal strategies for assessing model uniqueness in complex ecosystems.
Findings
PIER quantifies intrinsic model uniqueness.
Active auditing achieves minimax-optimal sample efficiency.
Shapley values fail to detect redundancy in ecosystems.
Abstract
As AI systems evolve from isolated predictors into complex, heterogeneous ecosystems of foundation models and specialized adapters, distinguishing genuine behavioral novelty from functional redundancy becomes a critical governance challenge. Here, we introduce a statistical framework for auditing model uniqueness based on In-Silico Quasi-Experimental Design (ISQED). By enforcing matched interventions across models, we isolate intrinsic model identity and quantify uniqueness as the Peer-Inexpressible Residual (PIER), i.e. the component of a target's behavior strictly irreducible to any stochastic convex combination of its peers, with vanishing PIER characterizing when such a routing-based substitution becomes possible. We establish the theoretical foundations of ecosystem auditing through three key contributions. First, we prove a fundamental limitation of observational logs: uniqueness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Scientific Computing and Data Management
