Are Bell's conditions for local realism general enough?
Emilio Santos

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Bell's conditions for local realism, proposing more realistic conditions for optical experiments that reveal a loophole allowing violations of Bell inequalities.
Contribution
It introduces more physical conditions for local realism in optical experiments, highlighting the coincidence-time loophole as a way to violate Bell inequalities.
Findings
Bell's idealized detector response is unrealistic for optical experiments
A realistic local model can violate Bell inequalities due to the coincidence-time loophole
The paper challenges the general applicability of Bell's conditions for local realism
Abstract
Bell conditions for local realism are critically revisited. In particular for optical experiments I criticize Bell's proposed response of detectors to signals as extremely idealized. More physical conditions are proposed, whence a realistic local model of an optical experiment is possible which violates the Clauser-Horne (Bell) inequality. The possibility rests on the existence of a coincidence-time loophole in the experiments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Optical and Acousto-Optic Technologies
