Negatives-Dominant Contrastive Learning for Generalization in Imbalanced Domains
Meng Cao, Jiexi Liu, Songcan Chen

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel contrastive learning approach called Negative-Dominant Contrastive Learning (NDCL) to improve model generalization in imbalanced domain settings by emphasizing negatives and enforcing posterior consistency.
Contribution
It provides the first theoretical generalization bound for Imbalanced Domain Generalization and proposes NDCL, a method that enhances discriminability and domain alignment through negative emphasis and re-weighted strategies.
Findings
NDCL outperforms existing methods on benchmark datasets.
Theoretical analysis confirms the importance of posterior discrepancy.
Negative emphasis improves minority class decision boundaries.
Abstract
Imbalanced Domain Generalization (IDG) focuses on mitigating both domain and label shifts, both of which fundamentally shape the model's decision boundaries, particularly under heterogeneous long-tailed distributions across domains. Despite its practical significance, it remains underexplored, primarily due to the technical complexity of handling their entanglement and the paucity of theoretical foundations. In this paper, we begin by theoretically establishing the generalization bound for IDG, highlighting the role of posterior discrepancy and decision margin. This bound motivates us to focus on directly steering decision boundaries, marking a clear departure from existing methods. Subsequently, we technically propose a novel Negative-Dominant Contrastive Learning (NDCL) for IDG to enhance discriminability while enforce posterior consistency across domains. Specifically, inter-class…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. The paper is clearly structured and easy to follow. 2. The derived generalization bound motivates the design choices in NDCL, linking domain discrepancy and class imbalance to posterior alignment. 3. Instead of relying on positive pair supervision, it is interesting that NDCL focuses on negative gradients to enlarge inter-class margins, which is conceptually fresh and practically effective. 4. Several experiments validate the proposed method, which improves significantly compared to previous
1. Although the authors provide a theory, it seems not to be related to the label imbalance and domain imbalance. 2. It is better to provide the visualization of the learned feature. 3. The experiments should also be done on the large-scale DomainNet dataset to further demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.
1. Imbalanced Domain Generalization is an important and practical extension of the DG setting, and the paper provides a good formalization. 2. The generalization bound highlights posterior discrepancy and margin effects, offering a potentially useful conceptual perspective. 3. NDCL integrates several mechanisms (contrastive, reweighting, alignment) into a unified training objective. 4. The authors compare with over twenty baselines across multiple imbalance configurations and datasets. 5. Th
1. The proposed NDCL mainly combines known components: (a) The “negative-dominant” contrastive loss is a simple reformulation of the InfoNCE / SupCon objective with reversed emphasis; similar ideas exist in hard-negative mining and OOD contrastive learning. (b) The re-weighted CE and prototype alignment are standard practices in long-tailed learning and multi-domain contrastive frameworks. The overall design feels incremental rather than conceptually new. 2. The presented generalization bound r
The paper’s key strength lies in addressing an underexplored yet practically important problem — Imbalanced Domain Generalization (IDG) which combines challenges of domain and label shift. Its theoretical formulation is a notable step forward, introducing a generalization bound that jointly accounts for posterior discrepancy and decision margin, offering a fresh lens on generalization under imbalance. Methodologically, the proposed Negative-Dominant Contrastive Learning (NDCL) framework is a cre
The paper’s main weakness lies in the gap between its theoretical claims and empirical validation. While the proposed generalization bound elegantly integrates posterior discrepancy and decision margin, it remains largely unverified quantitatively — no experiments explicitly measure or correlate these terms with observed performance. A small-scale synthetic or analytical validation could strengthen this theoretical link. From a novelty standpoint, NDCL’s “negative-dominant” formulation is concep
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Text and Document Classification Technologies
