Organizational Practices and Socio-Technical Design of Human-Centered AI
Thomas Herrmann

TL;DR
This paper examines how integrating AI into organizational practices from a socio-technical perspective supports human-centered AI by emphasizing communication, collaboration, and continuous learning within organizations.
Contribution
It introduces ten case-based patterns demonstrating socio-technical integration of AI in organizational processes for human-centered AI support.
Findings
AI adoption fosters new organizational learning practices
Socio-technical integration levels vary with effort and benefits
AI supports quality assurance and continuous improvement
Abstract
This contribution explores how the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into organizational practices can be effectively framed through a socio-technical perspective to comply with the requirements of Human-centered AI (HCAI). Instead of viewing AI merely as a technical tool, the analysis emphasizes the importance of embedding AI into communication, collaboration, and decision-making processes within organizations from a human-centered perspective. Ten case-based patterns illustrate how AI support of predictive maintenance can be organized to address quality assurance and continuous improvement and to provide different types of sup-port for HCAI. The analysis shows that AI adoption often requires and enables new forms of organizational learning, where specialists jointly interpret AI output, adapt workflows, and refine rules for system improve-ment. Different dimensions and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · AI in Service Interactions · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
