Model-Free Neural Filtering: A Comparison with Classical Filters in Nonlinear Systems
Zhuochen Liu, Hans Walker, Rahul Jain

TL;DR
This paper systematically compares neural network-based state estimators with classical filters in nonlinear systems, highlighting the strengths of structured neural models like SSMs in data-driven filtering tasks.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of neural estimators versus classical filters, emphasizing the effectiveness of structured neural models such as SSMs in nonlinear filtering.
Findings
Structured SSMs like Mamba outperform weaker classical filters.
Neural estimators achieve higher inference throughput.
Classical filters dominate when their assumptions are well matched.
Abstract
Neural network models are increasingly used for state estimation in control and decision-making, yet it remains unclear to what extent they behave as principled filters in nonlinear dynamical systems. Unlike classical filters, which rely on explicit dynamics and noise models, neural estimators can be trained purely from data. We present a systematic comparison between model-free neural estimators and classical filtering methods across multiple nonlinear scenarios. On the neural side, we evaluate Transformer-based models, recurrent neural networks, and state-space models; on the classical side, we compare against particle filters and nonlinear Kalman filters. Results show that structured state-space models (SSMs), in particular Mamba and Mamba-2, are consistently strong among neural estimators. They approach strong classical filters in several nonlinear systems and outperform weaker…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
