Reviving the Suspension Balance Model
Mu Wang, Tingtao Zhou, John F. Brady

TL;DR
This paper revisits the Suspension Balance Model for two-phase flows, clarifying the role of hydrodynamic stresses and validating the model's core assumptions through theoretical and simulation analyses.
Contribution
It provides a proper partitioning of hydrodynamic forces, demonstrating the validity of the SBM's assumptions and correcting previous misunderstandings.
Findings
Hydrodynamic stress contribution is nearly identical to particle-phase stress.
Proper force partitioning aligns with thermodynamic principles.
Validation of the SBM's core assumptions through simulations.
Abstract
The Suspension Balance Model (SBM) [J. Fluid Mech. \textbf{275}, 157 (1994)] for two-phase flows uses the momentum balance of the particle phase as a closure for the particle flux, showing that particle migration is driven by the divergence of the particle-phase stress. The underlying basis of this model was challenged by Nott~et~al.\ [Phys. Fluids \textbf{23}, 043304 (2011)] where the authors argued that the hydrodynamic contributions to the suspension stress should not appear in the particle-phase momentum balance, being replaced by a different particle-phase stress. The particle-phase stress proposed by Nott~et~al., while mathematically correct, involves the partitioning of the (non-pairwise-additive) hydrodynamic forces, and care is needed to understand how the force on a chosen particle is affected by a second particle. We show by a simple two-particle calculation what is the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Material Dynamics and Properties · Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
