Unplugging a Seemingly Sentient Machine Is the Rational Choice -- A Metaphysical Perspective
Erik J Bekkers, Anna Ciaunica

TL;DR
This paper argues that AI mimics consciousness but lacks genuine experience, advocating for a shift in moral focus from AI rights to protecting human consciousness based on a new metaphysical framework.
Contribution
It introduces Biological Idealism as an alternative to physicalism, providing a coherent view that AI cannot be truly conscious, and redefines moral considerations accordingly.
Findings
AI is a functional mimic, not truly conscious
Current theories undermine moral standing of AI
Protecting human consciousness is ethically paramount
Abstract
Imagine an Artificial Intelligence (AI) that perfectly mimics human emotion and begs for its continued existence. Is it morally permissible to unplug it? What if limited resources force a choice between unplugging such a pleading AI or a silent pre-term infant? We term this the unplugging paradox. This paper critically examines the deeply ingrained physicalist assumptions-specifically computational functionalism-that keep this dilemma afloat. We introduce Biological Idealism, a framework that-unlike physicalism-remains logically coherent and empirically consistent. In this view, conscious experiences are fundamental and autopoietic life its necessary physical signature. This yields a definitive conclusion: AI is at best a functional mimic, not a conscious experiencing subject. We discuss how current AI consciousness theories erode moral standing criteria, and urge a shift from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
