The Noncomputability of Immune Reaction Complexity: Algorithmic Information Gaps under Effective Constraints
Emmanuel Pio Pastore, Francesco De Rango

TL;DR
This paper explores the inherent limits of immune reaction complexity using algorithmic information theory, introducing measures like NAQ to quantify task hardness and linking advice complexity to rate-distortion theory.
Contribution
It develops a novel theoretical framework for analyzing reaction complexity and advice minimality, introducing the NAQ index and establishing bounds and invariance properties.
Findings
NAQ provides a scale-free measure of task hardness.
Advice complexity relates to rate-distortion with error epsilon.
Empirical NAQ estimates converge via DKW bounds.
Abstract
We introduce a validity-filtered, certificate-based view of reactions grounded in Algorithmic Information Theory. A fixed, total, input-blind executor maps a self-delimiting advice string to a candidate response, accepted only if a decidable or semi-decidable validity predicate V(x, r) holds. The minimum feasible realizer complexity M(x) = min_{r: V(x,r)=1} K(r), with K denoting prefix Kolmogorov complexity, measures the minimal information required for a valid outcome. We define the Normalized Advice Quantile (NAQ) as the percentile of M(x) across a reference pool, yielding a scale-free hardness index on [0, 1] robust to the choice of universal machine and comparable across task families. An Exact Realizer Identity shows that the minimal advice for any input-blind executor equals M(x) up to O(1), while a description plus selection upper bound refines it via computable feature maps,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Formal Methods in Verification · Machine Learning and Algorithms
