Machine-learning wall model of large-eddy simulation for low- and high-speed flows over rough surfaces

TL;DR

This paper introduces a neural network-based wall model for large-eddy simulation that effectively incorporates surface roughness effects across a wide range of flow speeds and conditions, with quantified uncertainty estimates.

Contribution

The novel model integrates surface roughness effects into LES using an artificial neural network trained on extensive DNS data, providing reliable predictions with uncertainty quantification across diverse flow regimes.

Findings

Prediction errors below 4% in a-priori tests.

Within 10% accuracy for wall shear stress in a-posteriori LES.

Errors within 20% for heating augmentation in hypersonic flows.

Abstract

We present a wall model for large-eddy simulation that incorporates surface-roughness effects and is applicable across low- and high-speed flows, for both transitional and fully rough conditions. The model, implemented using an artificial neural network, is trained on a direct numerical simulation database of compressible turbulent channel flows over rough walls. The dataset contains 372 cases spanning a wide range of irregular roughness topographies, including Gaussian and Weibull distributions, Mach numbers 0~3.3, and friction Reynolds numbers 180~2000. We employ an information-theoretic, dimensionless learning method to identify the inputs with the highest predictive power for the dimensionless wall friction and wall heat flux. Predictions are accompanied by a confidence score derived from a spectrally normalized neural Gaussian process, which quantifies uncertainty in regions that deviate from the training dataset. The model performance is first evaluated a-priori on 110 turbulent channel flow cases, yielding prediction errors below 4%. The model is assessed a-posteriori in wall-modeled large-eddy simulations across diverse test cases. These include over 160 subsonic and supersonic turbulent channel flows with rough walls, a transonic high-pressure turbine (HPT) blade with Gaussian roughness, a high-speed compression ramp with sandpaper roughness, and three hypersonic blunt bodies with sand-grain roughness. Results show that the proposed wall model typically achieves a-posteriori predictive accuracy within 10% for wall shear stress and within 15% for wall heat flux, with high confidence in the channel flows and HPT blade cases. In the rough-wall compression ramp and hypersonic blunt bodies, the model captures the heating augmentation with errors ranging 0%~20%. In the cases with the highest errors, the reduced performance is correctly detected by a drop in the confidence score.