Decentralized Identity in Practice: Benchmarking Latency, Cost, and Privacy
Abylay Satybaldy, Kamil Tylinski, Jiahua Xu

TL;DR
This study empirically benchmarks three ledger-based DID methods—Ethereum, Hedera, and XRP Ledger—evaluating their latency, cost, and privacy leakage to inform better system selection and configuration.
Contribution
It provides a systematic comparison of DID implementations across different ledgers, highlighting architectural trade-offs and operational behaviors.
Findings
Ethereum has high latency and cost for on-chain DID operations.
XRPL offers low latency and fees but higher metadata leakage.
Hedera achieves low latency, low fees, and minimal metadata exposure.
Abstract
Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) are increasingly deployed on distributed ledgers, yet systematic cross-platform evidence on their operational behavior remains limited. We present an empirical benchmarking study of three prominent ledger-based DID methods - Ethereum, Hedera, and XRP Ledger - using reference Software Development Kits (SDKs) under a unified experimental setup. We measure latency, transaction cost, and on-chain metadata exposure, normalizing latency by each platform's block or consensus interval and cost by its native value transfer fee. Privacy leakage is quantified using a Metadata-Leakage Score (MLS), an entropy-based measure expressed in bits per operation. Our results reveal distinct architectural trade-offs. Ethereum enables near-instant, off-chain DID creation, but incurs the highest latency and cost for on-chain lifecycle operations. XRPL delivers deterministic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management · Security and Verification in Computing · Software System Performance and Reliability
