LLM-Assisted Authentication and Fraud Detection
Emunah S-S. Chan, Aldar C-F. Chan

TL;DR
This paper presents LLM-based methods for authentication and fraud detection that improve flexibility, reduce false positives, and adapt to new scam tactics without retraining, enhancing security workflows.
Contribution
Introduces two novel LLM-enabled solutions: semantic-based authentication and a RAG-based fraud detection pipeline, improving robustness and adaptability over traditional methods.
Findings
Authentication accepts 99.5% of legitimate answers with 0.1% false acceptance.
Fraud detection reduces false positives from 17.2% to 3.5%.
LLMs enhance usability and robustness in security workflows.
Abstract
User authentication and fraud detection face growing challenges as digital systems expand and adversaries adopt increasingly sophisticated tactics. Traditional knowledge-based authentication remains rigid, requiring exact word-for-word string matches that fail to accommodate natural human memory and linguistic variation. Meanwhile, fraud-detection pipelines struggle to keep pace with rapidly evolving scam behaviors, leading to high false-positive rates and frequent retraining cycles required. This work introduces two complementary LLM-enabled solutions, namely, an LLM-assisted authentication mechanism that evaluates semantic correctness rather than exact wording, supported by document segmentation and a hybrid scoring method combining LLM judgement with cosine-similarity metrics and a RAG-based fraud-detection pipeline that grounds LLM reasoning in curated evidence to reduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
