CH3CCH as a thermometer in warm molecular gas

TL;DR

This study compares the effectiveness of CH3CCH and NH3 molecules as thermometers in warm molecular clouds, finding CH3CCH provides more accurate temperature estimates in star-forming regions.

Contribution

It demonstrates that CH3CCH rotational lines are more reliable than NH3 for measuring kinetic temperatures in warm, dense star-forming environments.

Findings

NH3-derived temperatures are systematically lower than CH3CCH-derived temperatures.

CH3CCH rotational lines thermalize closer to the kinetic temperature at lower densities.

CH3CCH is a more reliable thermometer in warm molecular gas near massive young stars.

Abstract

Kinetic temperature is a fundamental parameter in molecular clouds. Symmetric top molecules, such as NH$_3$ and CH$_3$CCH, are often used as thermometers. However, at high temperatures, NH$_3$(2,2) can be collisionally excited to NH$_3$(2,1) and rapidly decay to NH$_3$(1,1), which can lead to an underestimation of the kinetic temperature when using rotation temperatures derived from NH$_3$(1,1) and NH$_3$(2,2). In contrast, CH$_3$CCH is a symmetric top molecule with lower critical densities of its rotational levels than those of NH$_3$, which can be thermalized close to the kinetic temperature at relatively low densities of about 10$^{4}$ cm$^{-3}$. To compare the rotation temperatures derived from NH$_3$(1,1)$\&$(2,2) and CH$_3$CCH rotational levels in warm molecular gas, we used observational data toward 55 massive star-forming regions obtained with Yebes 40m and TMRT 65m. Our results show that rotation temperatures derived from NH$_3$(1,1)$\&$(2,2) are systematically lower than those from CH$_3$CCH 5-4. This suggests that CH$_3$CCH rotational lines with the same $J$+1$\rightarrow$$J$ quantum number may be a more reliable thermometer than NH$_3$(1,1)$\&$(2,2) in warm molecular gas located in the surroundings of massive young stellar objects or, more generally, in massive star-forming regions.