Decoupled Split Learning via Auxiliary Loss

TL;DR

This paper introduces a decoupled split learning method with auxiliary loss that reduces communication and memory overhead while maintaining comparable performance to traditional split learning.

Contribution

It proposes a novel beyond-backpropagation training approach for split learning using local auxiliary classifiers, reducing communication and memory costs.

Findings

Achieves comparable accuracy to standard split learning.

Reduces communication costs by approximately 50%.

Decreases peak memory usage by up to 58%.

Abstract

Split learning is a distributed training paradigm where a neural network is partitioned between clients and a server, which allows data to remain at the client while only intermediate activations are shared. Traditional split learning relies on end-to-end backpropagation across the client-server split point. This incurs a large communication overhead (i.e., forward activations and backward gradients need to be exchanged every iteration) and significant memory use (for storing activations and gradients). In this paper, we develop a beyond-backpropagation training method for split learning. In this approach, the client and server train their model partitions semi-independently, using local loss signals instead of propagated gradients. In particular, the client's network is augmented with a small auxiliary classifier at the split point to provide a local error signal, while the server trains on the client's transmitted activations using the true loss function. This decoupling removes the need to send backward gradients, which cuts communication costs roughly in half and also reduces memory overhead (as each side only stores local activations for its own backward pass). We evaluate our approach on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. Our experiments show two key results. First, the proposed approach achieves performance on par with standard split learning that uses backpropagation. Second, it significantly reduces communication (of transmitting activations/gradient) by 50% and peak memory usage by up to 58%.