Time-series based quantum state discrimination
Samuel Jung, Neel Vora, Akel Hashim, Yilun Xu, Gang Huang

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that applying time-series machine learning models, specifically LSTM networks, to raw quantum measurement signals significantly improves state discrimination accuracy over traditional clustering methods, especially in boundary cases.
Contribution
The study introduces the use of sequence-aware models like LSTM for quantum state discrimination, outperforming clustering on integrated signals by leveraging temporal information.
Findings
LSTM models outperform clustering in classification accuracy.
Temporal features improve discrimination of boundary cases.
Sequence models better handle noisy and transient measurement signals.
Abstract
Accurate quantum state readout is crucial for error correction and algorithms, but measurement errors are detrimental. Readout fidelity is typically limited by a poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and energy relaxation ( decay), a significant problem for superconducting qubits. While most approaches classify results using clustering algorithms on integrated readout signals, these methods cannot distinguish a qubit that was initially in the ground state from one that decayed to it during measurement. We instead propose using machine learning (ML) on the raw, non-integrated analog signal. We apply time-series classification models, such as a long short-term memory (LSTM) network, to the full data trajectory. We find that our LSTM model, combined with filtering and feature engineering, consistently outperforms clustering. The largest improvements come from reclassifying points in the…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
- Readout fidelity is a well-known bottleneck in superconducting qubit systems - Time-series framing of qubit readout is promising - The proposed approach is novel - Quality of the presentation is high
- The reported improvement is small, even if significant - Only GMM is used for comparison - The topic is not closely aligned with ICLR’s core areas of interest
Currently used methods do not employ temporal information, so employing sequence models for incorporating time series data is well-motivated. Thus, the problem is very relevant for quantum computing, as quantum error correction schemes require high quantum state readout fidelity. The experiments are based on real data and appear to be pratictically relevant. The experimental results (Table 2) indicate a consistent improvement of LSTM-based methods over the GMM-baseline method.
My main concern with this paper is that, from a machine learning perspective, the innovation is very limited. LSTMs are standard models for sequence modelling and applying them to time-series classification is well-established. Thus, there do not seem to be any insights for a broader ML audience. The main challenge and contribution of the paper appears to be in the data pre-processing step. Then, any time-series classification method could be applied. Overall, the paper is written in a way that
* The problem of error correction is, as clearly stated by the authors, a pressing issue in the community. Further, it appears that the LSTM approach improves the effective fidelity of these devices. * The experiments were conducted on real quantum devices, removing issues with simulation parameters and noise modeling. * The concepts are made clear to a broader audience, and in general, the paper is written very well.
While overall the paper is quite sound and of interest, there were some parts that lacked clarity and accuracy. * Why do the authors not show the direct classification results? Showing only where one model gets it right but the other wrong does little to highlight the performance of the models. Further, without showing where both models go wrong, it isn't clear whether this comes down to architecture or other factors. I see that this is included as fidelity scores later in the paper, but perha
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum many-body systems · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
