GraIP: A Benchmarking Framework For Neural Graph Inverse Problems
Semih Cant\"urk, Andrei Manolache, Arman Mielke, Chendi Qian, Antoine Siraudin, Christopher Morris, Mathias Niepert, Guy Wolf

TL;DR
This paper introduces GraIP, a unifying framework for graph inverse problems that formalizes various graph learning tasks as inverse problems, providing benchmarks and evaluating baseline methods to advance structural learning.
Contribution
The paper proposes the GraIP framework, formalizing diverse graph inverse problems, and introduces benchmark datasets and metrics for evaluation.
Findings
Demonstrates GraIP's versatility across multiple tasks.
Provides benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics.
Empirically evaluates baseline methods.
Abstract
A wide range of graph learning tasks, such as structure discovery, temporal graph analysis, and combinatorial optimization, focus on inferring graph structures from data, rather than making predictions on given graphs. However, the respective methods to solve such problems are often developed in an isolated, task-specific manner and thus lack a unifying theoretical foundation. Here, we provide a stepping stone towards the formation of such a foundation and further development by introducing the Neural Graph Inverse Problem (GraIP) conceptual framework, which formalizes and reframes a broad class of graph learning tasks as inverse problems. Unlike discriminative approaches that directly predict target variables from given graph inputs, the GraIP paradigm addresses inverse problems, i.e., it relies on observational data and aims to recover the underlying graph structure by reversing the…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
Unifying lens that cleanly separates I (inverse) vs F (forward) and makes many prior works “click together.” Easy to port methods across domains Benchmarking clarity: clearly specified domains, data, metrics, and simple, reproducible baselines; tables communicate the discretization story well.
Scope of benchmarks is modest. For CD, only linear-Gaussian synthetic settings are shown. For NRI, only Springs is used. For rewiring, only ZINC. The current baseline set is too narrow for a benchmarking paper. It does not fully establish where GraIP stands relative to strong alternatives across domains.
- The paper is well-written and structured, ideas are presented clearly and easy to follow. - Interesting perspective on existing problems under the inverse problem lens, with detailed analysis casting them as instances of the proposed framework. - Interesting discussion on practical challenges: discretization bottleneck and ill-posedness for large graphs, along with potential future combinations of generative models.
- While the unification is interesting, the core idea of framing graph inference as an inverse problem is not fundamentally new. The framework is largely a re-framing of existing approaches rather than a methodological advance. - While integrating discretization methods like I-MLE or STE for some existing models is somewhat novel, the core framework largely reframes existing methods without introducing new technical improvements. - Benchmarks for the first two instances are based on synthetic da
- Originality: This is the first systematic attempt to unify graph structure learning tasks under the inverse problem paradigm. The framing is conceptually novel and provides a fresh perspective on seemingly disparate tasks like rewiring, causal discovery, and relational inference. It opens up new avenues for cross-pollination between fields like combinatorial optimization, causal inference, and graph generation. - Technical Quality: The paper is mathematically rigorous and well-grounded in the
- Limited Novel Algorithmic Contributions: While GraIP is conceptually elegant, the paper does not introduce new models or algorithms. It reframes existing ones and benchmarks them under a unified lens. As a result, the algorithmic novelty is low, and the empirical improvements are marginal in some domains (e.g., causal discovery). - Scalability and Efficiency Not Discussed: The paper does not address the computational scalability of GraIP formulations. For example, in causal discovery and GRN
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Graph Theory and Algorithms · Complex Network Analysis Techniques
