There is no Definable Grauert Direct Image Theorem
H\'el\`ene Esnault, Moritz Kerz

TL;DR
The paper demonstrates that a definable Grauert Direct Image Theorem cannot exist in o-minimal geometry because it would imply a property that contradicts the Definable Chow Theorem, highlighting limitations in definable complex geometry.
Contribution
It shows the non-existence of a definable Grauert Direct Image Theorem in o-minimal geometry by linking it to the non-representability of the definable Picard functor.
Findings
A definable Grauert Direct Image Theorem would imply a weak representability of the definable Picard functor.
Such weak representability is impossible due to the Definable Chow Theorem.
The result clarifies limitations of definable complex geometry in o-minimal structures.
Abstract
We prove the claim in the title by showing that a definable Grauert Direct Image Theorem in o-minimal geometry would imply a weak representability-like property of the definable Picard functor. However, this weak representability cannot hold because of the Definable Chow Theorem of Peterzil and Starchenko. v2: small typos corrected.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
