Intracluster light as a dark matter tracer: how their spatial and kinematic relationship is shaped by satellite demographics
G Martin (1), F R Pearce (1), N A Hatch (1), H J Brown (1), J Butler (1), Y M Bahe (1, 2), W Cui (3, 4, 5), Y Dubois (6), A Knebe (3, 4, 7) ((1) School of Physics, Astronomy, University of Nottingham, UK, (2) Laboratory of Astrophysics, EPFL, Switzerland

TL;DR
This study uses N-body simulations to show that the spatial and kinematic differences between intracluster light and dark matter are primarily driven by satellite galaxy demographics, enabling ICL to trace underlying dark matter distributions.
Contribution
It introduces a predictive model linking satellite demographics to the phase-space and radial distribution differences between ICL and dark matter in galaxy clusters.
Findings
Stripped stars occupy lower-energy, lower-angular momentum regions than stripped dark matter.
The phase-space difference increases with the satellite-to-host mass ratio.
The ICL is always more centrally concentrated than dark matter, with offset magnitude depending on satellite mass.
Abstract
We investigate how the orbital evolution and mass distribution of infalling satellite galaxies shape the phase-space and radial distributions of intracluster light (ICL) relative to the underlying cluster dark matter (DM) halo. Using N-body simulations, we follow the tidal stripping and orbital evolution of satellite galaxies as they are accreted into a live cluster halo, systematically varying satellite-to-host mass ratio and orbital circularity. We measure the specific orbital energy and angular momentum of stripped stellar and DM material, finding that the stripped stars consistently occupy lower-energy and lower-angular momentum regions of phase-space than the stripped DM. The magnitude of this difference increases strongly towards more equal satellite--to--host mass ratios, while the dependence on orbital circularity is weak. We construct a predictive model for the phase-space…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
