Distinguishing Graphs by Counting Homomorphisms from Sparse Graphs
Daniel Neuen, Tim Seppelt

TL;DR
This paper investigates the power of counting homomorphisms from sparse graphs to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs, proving conjectures for certain classes and establishing hierarchies and limitations of this method.
Contribution
It proves Roberson's conjecture for vortex-free classes, shows the limits of homomorphism indistinguishability over minor-excluding classes, and establishes hierarchies among graph classes based on genus.
Findings
Homomorphism indistinguishability over graphs of bounded Euler genus does not imply isomorphism.
Roberson's conjecture holds for vortex-free graph classes.
A strict hierarchy exists among graph classes based on genus and other parameters.
Abstract
Lov\'asz (1967) showed that two graphs and are isomorphic if, and only if, they are homomorphism indistinguishable over all graphs, i.e., and admit the same number of number of homomorphisms from every graph . Subsequently, a substantial line of work studied homomorphism indistinguishability over restricted graph classes. For example, homomorphism indistinguishability over minor-closed graph classes such as the class of planar graphs, the class of graphs of treewidth , pathwidth , or treedepth , was shown to be equivalent to quantum isomorphism and equivalences with respect to counting logic fragments, respectively. Via such characterisations, the distinguishing power of e.g. logical or quantum graph isomorphism relaxations can be studied with graph-theoretic means. In this vein, Roberson (2022) conjectured that homomorphism…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems · Graph theory and applications
