Asymptotics of the d'Arcais Numbers at Small $k$

TL;DR

This paper investigates the asymptotic behavior of d'Arcais numbers at small fixed k, connecting them to divisor sums and classical formulas, and examines a conjecture related to their ratios.

Contribution

It provides a detailed asymptotic analysis of d'Arcais numbers for fixed small k, extending Ramanujan's formulas and testing a conjecture on their ratios.

Findings

Asymptotic ratio involving divisor sums and zeta functions.

Conjecture on ratios is false for k=2, true for k≥3 with large n.

Connections to Ramanujan's formulas and Hardy-Ramanujan circle method.

Abstract

The d'Arcais numbers are the triangular array $\{A(2,n,k)\, :\, n=0,1,\dots,\, k=0,\dots,n\}$, such that $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \sum_{k=0}^{n} A(2,n,k) x^k z^n/n! = ((z;z)_{\infty})^{-x}$. The infinite $q$-Pochhammer symbol is $(q;q)_{\infty} = \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} (1-q^n)$. Holding $k$ fixed and considering large $n$, we note that the ratio $k! A(2,n,k)/n!$ is asymptotic to $C(k) \sigma_{2k-1}(n)/n^k$ where the divisor sum function is $\sigma_p(n) = \sum_{d|n} d^p$ and $C(k) = (\zeta(2))^k/(\Gamma(k) \zeta(2k))$. This is a slightly generalized version of one of Ramanujan's formulas from his paper, ``On Certain Arithmetical Functions," and it is an immediate consequence of the more recent article of Oliver, Shreshta and Thorne. Heim and Neuhauser made a conjecture, that $A(2,n,k)/A(2,n,k-1)$ is greater than or equal to $A(2,n,k+1)/A(2,n,k)$, for $k=2,3,\dots$ and all $n$. The conjecture is false for $k=2$, and it is true for $k=3,4,\dots$ when $n$ is sufficiently large. We consider the Hardy-Ramanujan circle method as a heuristic step.