TL;DR
DRPG is an innovative agentic framework that enhances automated academic rebuttal generation by decomposing reviews, retrieving evidence, planning strategies, and generating targeted responses, outperforming existing methods.
Contribution
The paper introduces DRPG, a novel four-step framework that significantly improves automated rebuttal quality and explainability in academic peer review processes.
Findings
DRPG's planner achieves over 98% accuracy in identifying rebuttal directions.
Outperforms existing rebuttal pipelines on top-tier conference data.
Achieves performance beyond average human levels with an 8B model.
Abstract
Despite the growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in scientific research workflows, automated support for academic rebuttal, a crucial step in academic communication and peer review, remains largely underexplored. Existing approaches typically rely on off-the-shelf LLMs or simple pipelines, which struggle with long-context understanding and often fail to produce targeted and persuasive responses. In this paper, we propose DRPG, an agentic framework for automatic academic rebuttal generation that operates through four steps: Decompose reviews into atomic concerns, Retrieve relevant evidence from the paper, Plan rebuttal strategies, and Generate responses accordingly. Notably, the Planner in DRPG reaches over 98% accuracy in identifying the most feasible rebuttal direction. Experiments on data from top-tier conferences demonstrate that DRPG significantly outperforms existing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
