Comparison of Single Carrier FTN-QAM and PCS-QAM for Amplifier-less Coherent Communication Systems
Dongdong Zou, Fan Li, Wei Wang, Zhongxing Tian, Yuheng Liu, Gangxiang Shen, and Yi Cai
TL;DR
This paper compares the performance of FTN-QAM and PCS-QAM modulation schemes in amplifier-less short-reach coherent communication systems, highlighting the advantages of FTN-16QAM with phase tracking and turbo equalization.
Contribution
It provides a performance comparison demonstrating FTN-QAM's power margin advantage over PCS-QAM in specific system configurations.
Findings
FTN-16QAM has about 0.9dB power margin advantage over PCS-64QAM.
Phase tracking partial response DFE and turbo equalization improve system performance.
The study focuses on amplifier-less short-reach coherent communication systems.
Abstract
A performance comparison of FTN-QAM and PCS-QAM for amplifier-less short-reach coherent communication systems is provided. With the applications of phase tracking partial response DFE and turbo equalization strategy, FTN-16QAM exhibits about 0.9dB power margin advantage over PCS-64QAM.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPAPR reduction in OFDM · Optical Network Technologies · Advanced Power Amplifier Design