Identifying and Correcting Label Noise for Robust GNNs via Influence Contradiction
Wei Ju, Wei Zhang, Siyu Yi, Zhengyang Mao, Yifan Wang, Jingyang Yuan, Zhiping Xiao, Ziyue Qiao, Ming Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces ICGNN, a method that uses graph structure and influence contradiction scores to identify and correct noisy labels in GNNs, improving robustness and accuracy on benchmark datasets.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel noise detection and correction framework for GNNs that leverages influence contradiction scores and graph diffusion, enhancing robustness against label noise.
Findings
ICGNN effectively detects noisy labels using influence contradiction scores.
The approach improves GNN robustness and accuracy on benchmark datasets.
Incorporating pseudo-labeling further enhances model performance.
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown remarkable capabilities in learning from graph-structured data with various applications such as social analysis and bioinformatics. However, the presence of label noise in real scenarios poses a significant challenge in learning robust GNNs, and their effectiveness can be severely impacted when dealing with noisy labels on graphs, often stemming from annotation errors or inconsistencies. To address this, in this paper we propose a novel approach called ICGNN that harnesses the structure information of the graph to effectively alleviate the challenges posed by noisy labels. Specifically, we first design a novel noise indicator that measures the influence contradiction score (ICS) based on the graph diffusion matrix to quantify the credibility of nodes with clean labels, such that nodes with higher ICS values are more likely to be detected as…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Conference Withdrawn Submission
1. The structure of the paper is clear. 2. The proposed measurement appears meaningful.
1. Clarity of the Proposed Problem The proposed research problem is not clearly defined. For example, the statement “nodes with higher ICS values are more likely to be detected as having noisy labels” is confusing — are nodes with higher ICS values considered correct or mislabeled? In addition, the phrase “the credibility of nodes with clean labels” is unclear. If a label is already clean, what does “credibility” mean in this context? Overall, the problem formulation and motivation for detecting
- The paper is well-structured and clearly written, making it easy to follow. - The overall methodological design is reasonable: the ICS mechanism effectively quantifies the impact of noisy labels, while the use of soft labels mitigates confirmation bias. - The experiments take into account large-scale GNN scenarios, which strengthens the practical relevance of the work.
When the proportion of labeled nodes is relatively high, the computational cost of calculating ICS becomes significant. - The ICS mechanism is likely to struggle in distinguishing between hard samples and mislabeled samples—an aspect that is particularly crucial in robust graph learning. - The proposed approach may be highly sensitive to the number of node classes, yet this factor is neither experimentally examined nor discussed. - The study does not include experiments on real-world noisy da
1. Originality: The paper proposes a framework for improving the robustness of GNNs under label noise. Unlike prior works that mainly rely on confidence estimation or sample reweighting, this paper proposes the Influence Contradiction Score (ICS) provides a principled way to identify mislabeled samples by leveraging the inherent structural dependency in GNNs, rather than relying on purely probabilistic confidence signals. 2. Quality: The technical pipeline is coherent and logically motivated. T
1. The method's correction mechanism heavily relies on neighbor label consistency. In low-homogeneity graphs (such as Chameleon and Squirrel), neighbor labels may have significant semantic differences, potentially leading to incorrect corrections. It is recommended to conduct empirical analysis or ablation experiments on low-homogeneity datasets to verify the method's robustness. 2. Although the paper analyzes the method's computational time complexity, the computation of the influence contradi
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Big Data and Digital Economy
