Studying Mobile Spatial Collaboration across Video Calls and Augmented Reality

TL;DR

This study compares mobile video calls and augmented reality for spatial collaboration, revealing how each medium influences interaction, shared understanding, and coordination in remote environments.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of how mobile AR and video calls differ in supporting spatial collaboration, informing future system design.

Findings

AR enables more spatial engagement and interaction with the environment.

Video calls facilitate clearer shared understanding and direct communication.

Both mediums have unique benefits and limitations for remote spatial collaboration.

Abstract

Mobile video calls are widely used to share information about real-world objects and environments with remote collaborators. While these calls provide valuable visual context in real time, the experience of interacting with people and moving around a space is significantly reduced when compared to co-located conversations. Recent work has demonstrated the potential of Mobile Augmented Reality applications to enable more spatial forms of collaboration across distance. To better understand the dynamics of mobile AR collaboration and how this medium compares against the status quo, we conducted a comparative structured observation study to analyze people's perception of space and interaction with remote collaborators across mobile video calls and AR-based calls. Fourteen pairs of participants completed a spatial collaboration task using each medium. Through a mixed-methods analysis of session videos, transcripts, motion logs, post-task exercises, and interviews, we highlight how the choice of medium influences the roles and responsibilities that collaborators take on and the construction of a shared language for coordination. We discuss the importance of spatial reasoning with one's body, how video calls help participants "be on the same page" more directly, and how AR calls enable both onsite and remote collaborators to engage with the space and each other in ways that resemble in-person interaction. Our study offers a nuanced view of the benefits and limitations of both mediums, and we conclude with a discussion of design implications for future systems that integrate mobile video and AR to better support spatial collaboration in its many forms.