Who Gets Which Message? Auditing Demographic Bias in LLM-Generated Targeted Text
Tunazzina Islam

TL;DR
This paper systematically analyzes demographic biases in LLM-generated targeted messages, revealing consistent stereotypes and disparities across models and contexts, emphasizing the importance of bias-aware generation and auditing.
Contribution
It introduces a controlled evaluation framework for demographic-conditioned message generation in LLMs and uncovers inherent biases in climate communication scenarios.
Findings
Male- and youth-targeted messages are more assertive and progressive.
Female- and senior-targeted messages emphasize warmth and care.
Context amplifies demographic disparities and affects persuasion scores.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of generating personalized, persuasive text at scale, raising new questions about bias and fairness in automated communication. This paper presents the first systematic analysis of how LLMs behave when tasked with demographic-conditioned targeted messaging. We introduce a controlled evaluation framework using three leading models: GPT-4o, Llama-3.3, and Mistral-Large-2.1, across two generation settings: Standalone Generation, which isolates intrinsic demographic effects, and Context-Rich Generation, which incorporates thematic and regional context to emulate realistic targeting. We evaluate generated messages along three dimensions: lexical content, language style, and persuasive framing. We instantiate this framework on climate communication and find consistent age- and gender-based asymmetries across models: male- and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
