Evaluating Aggregated Relational Data Models with Simple Diagnostics
Ian Laga, Benjamin Vogel, Jieyun Wang, Anna Smith, Owen Ward

TL;DR
This paper introduces a diagnostic framework for evaluating the fit of Aggregated Relational Data models, enabling practitioners to systematically assess model assumptions and improve model selection.
Contribution
The paper presents a new, systematic diagnostic workflow for ARD models that simplifies model evaluation without extensive Bayesian computations.
Findings
Diagnostics effectively identify model misfit sources
Workflow improves model selection accuracy
Applicable to large ARD datasets
Abstract
Aggregated Relational Data (ARD) contain summary information about individual social networks and are widely used to estimate social network characteristics and the size of populations of interest. Although a variety of ARD estimators exist, practitioners currently lack guidance on how to evaluate whether a selected model adequately fits the data. We introduce a diagnostic framework for ARD models that provides a systematic, reproducible process for assessing covariate structure, distributional assumptions, and correlation. The diagnostics are based on point estimates, using either maximum likelihood or maximum a posteriori optimization, which allows quick evaluation without requiring repeated Bayesian model fitting. Through simulation studies and applications to large ARD datasets, we show that the proposed workflow identifies common sources of model misfit and helps researchers select…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Methods and Mixture Models · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Mental Health Research Topics
