FedSGM: A Unified Framework for Constraint Aware, Bidirectionally Compressed, Multi-Step Federated Optimization
Antesh Upadhyay, Sang Bin Moon, and Abolfazl Hashemi

TL;DR
FedSGM is a comprehensive federated learning framework that effectively manages constraints, communication efficiency, local updates, and partial participation, backed by theoretical guarantees and experimental validation.
Contribution
FedSGM uniquely unifies constraint handling, compression, multi-step local updates, and partial participation in federated learning with proven convergence guarantees.
Findings
Achieves $oldsymbol{ ext{O}}(1/\sqrt{T})$ convergence rate.
Effectively corrects bias from compression with error feedback.
Validated on Neyman-Pearson classification and CMDP tasks.
Abstract
We introduce FedSGM, a unified framework for federated constrained optimization that addresses four major challenges in federated learning (FL): functional constraints, communication bottlenecks, local updates, and partial client participation. Building on the switching gradient method, FedSGM provides projection-free, primal-only updates, avoiding expensive dual-variable tuning or inner solvers. To handle communication limits, FedSGM incorporates bi-directional error feedback, correcting the bias introduced by compression while explicitly understanding the interaction between compression noise and multi-step local updates. We derive convergence guarantees showing that the averaged iterate achieves the canonical rate, with additional high-probability bounds that decouple optimization progress from sampling noise due to partial participation.…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. The work is the first work formulating federated IV via federated GMM. 2. The solid theoretical results strengthen the work. 3. The experimental results shows that the federated IV analysis framework is efficient in recovering the GMM estimators.
The experimental results in the main body of the paper are limited. The authors could move some of the results from the appendix for the final version of the draft.
1. The paper provides a rigorous and extensive theoretical analysis of its framework. 2. Well-motivated problems and applications.
1. Lack of Empirical Validation: The authors have not compared their proposed method with the state-of-the-art. The experiments (Section 4) only compare FEDSGM against a "Centralized" (i.e., non-federated) version of itself which is an ablation study. 2. It demonstrates that the federated setting introduces a performance cost (which is expected) but tells us nothing about whether FEDSGM is better than any other existing method. 3. Communication Efficiency: In this paper, the authors does not
- The unification of these aspects of federated learning (local steps, communication compression \& error feedback, partial participation) under one framework is meaningful and relevant. If the framework recovers the best-known convergence rates for all covered scenarios of literature (as claimed), it is worth publishing on its own. - The authors provide high-probability convergence guarantees for both hard and soft switching.
**Constraint formulation**: The novelty and significance of the constraint formulation seem to be overstated. Assumption 3 restricts the generality of the framework, limiting the scope of the unification. Hard and soft switching closely resemble well-known approaches for minimizing an unconstrained regularized objective, with the regularizer R chosen as: R(w)=0 if G(w)<=\eps and \infty otherwise (see the formulation [1]). In this viewpoint, the literature review seems to be inadequate. > [1] Co
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
