Investigating Retargetability Claims for Quantum Compilers
Luke Southall, Joshua Ammermann, Rinor Kelmendi, Domenik Eichhorn, Ina Schaefer

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the retargetability of quantum compilers across different hardware platforms, introducing a metric and analyzing Tket, Qiskit, and ProjectQ to guide developers in choosing suitable tools.
Contribution
It develops a new metric for assessing quantum compiler retargetability and provides an empirical comparison of three leading compilers.
Findings
Tket shows the highest retargetability among the tested compilers.
Qiskit has moderate retargetability, close to Tket.
ProjectQ exhibits the lowest retargetability.
Abstract
In the NISQ-era, there is a wide variety of hardware manufacturers building quantum computers. Each of these companies may choose different approaches and hardware architectures for their machines. This poses a problem for quantum software engineering, as the retargetability of quantum programs across different hardware platforms becomes a non-trivial challenge. In response to this problem, various retargetable quantum compilers have been presented in the scientific literature. These promise the ability to compile software for different hardware platforms, enabling retargetability for quantum software. In this paper, we develop and apply a metric by which the retargetability of the quantum compilers can be assessed. We develop and run a study to analyze key aspects regarding the retargetability of the compilers Tket, Qiskit, and ProjectQ. Our findings indicate that Tket demonstrates the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Distributed systems and fault tolerance
