Is the diurnal pattern sufficient to explain intraday variation in volatility? A nonparametric assessment
Kim Christensen, Ulrich Hounyo, Mark Podolskij

TL;DR
This paper introduces a nonparametric test to determine if diurnal patterns fully explain intraday volatility variations, accounting for jumps and noise, and finds that while diurnal patterns are significant, other factors also contribute.
Contribution
It develops a novel nonparametric testing framework using high-frequency data, extending bipower variation, and proposes a bootstrap method for improved inference.
Findings
Diurnal pattern explains a significant part of intraday volatility.
Stochastic volatility causes divergence in the test statistic.
The bootstrap approach improves test size accuracy.
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a nonparametric way to test the hypothesis that time-variation in intraday volatility is caused solely by a deterministic and recurrent diurnal pattern. We assume that noisy high-frequency data from a discretely sampled jump-diffusion process are available. The test is then based on asset returns, which are deflated by the seasonal component and therefore homoskedastic under the null. To construct our test statistic, we extend the concept of pre-averaged bipower variation to a general It\^o semimartingale setting via a truncation device. We prove a central limit theorem for this statistic and construct a positive semi-definite estimator of the asymptotic covariance matrix. The -statistic (after pre-averaging and jump-truncation) diverges in the presence of stochastic volatility and has a standard normal distribution otherwise. We show that replacing the true…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
