Inference for competing risks based on area between curves statistics
Simon Mack, Marc Ditzhaus, Merle Munko, Markus Pauly

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new statistical test based on the area between cumulative incidence functions for competing risks, using a wild bootstrap approach to handle crossing functions and improve inference accuracy.
Contribution
It proposes a novel area-based test statistic with a bootstrap method for valid inference in competing risks models with crossing cumulative incidence functions.
Findings
The proposed method performs well in simulations compared to existing tests.
It effectively handles crossing cumulative incidence functions.
The approach is asymptotically valid and practical for real data analysis.
Abstract
In competing risks models, cumulative incidence functions are commonly compared to infer differences between groups. Many existing inference methods, however, struggle when these functions cross during the time frame of interest. To address this problem, we investigate a test statistic based on the area between cumulative incidence functions. As the corresponding limiting distribution depends on quantities that are typically unknown, we propose a wild bootstrap approach to obtain a feasible and asymptotically valid two-sample test. The finite sample performance of the proposed method, in comparison with existing methods, is examined in an extensive simulation study.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Risk and Portfolio Optimization · Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
