The detectability of bars at high redshift: a case study using Euclid-like mock observations of TNG50 simulated galaxies

TL;DR

This study investigates how Euclid-like observational conditions impact the detection of bars in simulated galaxies from TNG50, revealing significant biases that affect the estimated bar fraction at high redshift.

Contribution

It provides a quantitative analysis of observational biases on bar detectability in cosmological simulations, using mock observations to compare detection methods.

Findings

Bar detection varies significantly with observational conditions.

Zoobot recovers only 31 out of 141 bars at z=0.5.

Bar fraction estimates are highly sensitive to detection method and observational biases.

Abstract

Modern surveys such as Euclid report a decline in the fraction of barred galaxies from the local Universe to $z \sim 1$, whereas the TNG50 simulation predicts higher bar fractions, in tension with observations. This discrepancy may be due to observational biases in bar detectability when comparing simulations with observations. We present a proof-of-concept study quantifying how Euclid-like observational conditions affect bar detectability in TNG50. We analysed the entire galaxy sample at $z = 0.5$ and highlight one borderline case with a bar length of 2.1 kpc and bar strength $A_2 = 0.4$. Synthetic images were produced with Monte Carlo radiative transfer and realistic post-processing, and analysed with ellipse fitting and Fourier decomposition, as well as the recently constructed Zoobot analysis. Results were compared to idealised, noise-free stellar mass maps. In the illustrative case the bar is clearly detected in the mass map and remains visible in the Euclid VIS $I_{\rm E}$ filter, where Zoobot also classifies it as barred, but becomes undetectable in $Y_{\rm E}$ and in the VIS-NISP RGB composite, with all methods failing outside VIS. Extending to the full $z = 0.5$ sample, Zoobot recovers only 31/141 galaxies, while $A_2$ and ellipse fitting perform better (80/141 and 67/141) but still miss many short or weak bars. When non-detections are counted as unbarred, the bar fraction of 44 percent falls to $12\!-\!33$ percent depending on the method. These results demonstrate the strong impact of observational effects on bar detectability and motivate bar-fraction estimates which incorporate realistic instrumental conditions across redshift in cosmological simulations.