On the rationality of the Weil Representation and the local theta correspondence
Justin Trias

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the Weil representation and local theta correspondence are rational over certain fields, providing explicit descent methods and extending results to various coefficient fields.
Contribution
It proves the rationality of the Weil representation over non-archimedean local fields and establishes the validity of the theta correspondence over perfect fields.
Findings
Weil representation can be realized over a number field.
Explicit descent describes the specific number field for the Weil representation.
Theta correspondence over a perfect field is valid iff over its algebraic closure.
Abstract
We prove that the Weil representation over a non-archimedean local field can be realised with coefficients in a number field. We give an explicit descent argument to describe precisely which number field the Weil representation descends to. Our methods also apply over more general coefficient fields, such as -modular coefficient fields, as well as coefficient rings such as rings of integers i.e. in families. We also prove that the theta correspondence over a perfect field is valid if and only if it is valid over the algebraic closure of this perfect field. These two results together show that the classical local theta correspondence is rational.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
