Source identification for the Swift-BAT 150-month hard X-ray catalog using soft X-ray observations
K. Imam, N. Torres-Alba, S. Marchesi, M. Ajello, S. Joffre, I. Cox, A. Pizzetti, X. Zhao, A. Segreto, A. Banerjee, I. Pal, V. E. Gianolli, D. Stern

TL;DR
This paper catalogs 251 potential counterparts for unassociated Swift-BAT 150-month hard X-ray sources, using soft X-ray observations from multiple telescopes to identify and classify their nature.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive soft X-ray follow-up for these sources, improving identification and classification of previously unassociated hard X-ray detections.
Findings
37% are active galactic nuclei
23% are galaxies
Remaining sources include pulsars and cataclysmic variables
Abstract
We present a comprehensive catalog of 251 potential counterparts for 250 unassociated hard X-ray sources detected in the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) 150-month hard X-ray survey. Over 150 months of observation, BAT has detected 2339 sources in the 15-150 keV energy range. Among these, 344 do not have a previously identified low-energy counterpart. Our study focuses on the analysis of soft X-ray observations at energies below 10 keV, spatially overlapping with these new Swift-BAT hard X-ray sources. Such observations were taken with Chandra, Swift-XRT, eROSITA, and XMM-Newton. Within the sample of 251 potential counterparts, 94 (37 percent) are identified as active galactic nuclei and 58 (23 percent) as galaxies. The remaining 99 sources (40 percent) include pulsars, cataclysmic variables, and unclassified soft X-ray counterparts in the 0.5-10 keV band. Redshift information is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
