Can We Trust LLM Detectors?
Jivnesh Sandhan, Harshit Jaiswal, Fei Cheng, Yugo Murawaki

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the robustness of existing LLM detectors, revealing their brittleness under distribution shifts and proposing a supervised contrastive learning framework to improve domain generalization.
Contribution
It systematically assesses current detection methods and introduces a novel supervised contrastive learning approach for more reliable AI text detection across domains.
Findings
Supervised detectors perform well in-domain but poorly out-of-domain.
Training-free methods are highly sensitive to proxy choice.
Fundamental challenges exist in creating domain-agnostic detectors.
Abstract
The rapid adoption of LLMs has increased the need for reliable AI text detection, yet existing detectors often fail outside controlled benchmarks. We systematically evaluate 2 dominant paradigms (training-free and supervised) and show that both are brittle under distribution shift, unseen generators, and simple stylistic perturbations. To address these limitations, we propose a supervised contrastive learning (SCL) framework that learns discriminative style embeddings. Experiments show that while supervised detectors excel in-domain, they degrade sharply out-of-domain, and training-free methods remain highly sensitive to proxy choice. Overall, our results expose fundamental challenges in building domain-agnostic detectors. Our code is available at: https://github.com/HARSHITJAIS14/DetectAI
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuthorship Attribution and Profiling · Topic Modeling · Text and Document Classification Technologies
