The Algorithmic Barrier: Quantifying Artificial Frictional Unemployment in Automated Recruitment Systems
Ibrahim Denis Fofanah

TL;DR
This paper investigates how automated recruitment systems cause artificial frictional unemployment by misinterpreting candidate skills, and demonstrates that semantic matching improves hiring efficiency and reduces economic costs.
Contribution
It formalizes artificial frictional unemployment caused by keyword-based screening and proposes semantic matching as a solution to improve labor market efficiency.
Findings
Semantic matching improves recall and matching efficiency.
Automated systems contribute to artificial unemployment.
Semantic alignment reduces economic costs of hiring.
Abstract
The United States labor market exhibits a persistent coexistence of high job vacancy rates and prolonged unemployment duration, a pattern that standard labor market theory struggles to explain. This paper argues that a non-trivial portion of contemporary frictional unemployment is artificially induced by automated recruitment systems that rely on deterministic keyword-based screening. Drawing on labor economics, information asymmetry theory, and prior work on algorithmic hiring, we formalize this phenomenon as artificial frictional unemployment arising from semantic misinterpretation of candidate competencies. We evaluate this claim using controlled simulations that compare legacy keyword-based screening with semantic matching based on high-dimensional vector representations of resumes and job descriptions. The results demonstrate substantial improvements in recall and overall…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEmployer Branding and e-HRM · AI and HR Technologies · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
