The failed failed-supernova scenario of M31-2014-DS1

TL;DR

This paper critically evaluates a failed-supernova explanation for the M31-2014-DS1 event, finding it requires unlikely fine-tuning and predicts higher radiation than observed, thus favoring a binary interaction scenario.

Contribution

The study demonstrates that the failed-supernova scenario for M31-2014-DS1 is unlikely due to fine-tuning and inconsistent radiation predictions, supporting an alternative binary interaction model.

Findings

Failed-supernova scenario requires unlikely fine-tuning.

Predicted radiation exceeds observed levels by an order of magnitude.

Binary interaction and dust ejection are more plausible explanations.

Abstract

I examine a recently proposed failed-supernova scenario for the fading of the yellow supergiant event M31-2014-DS1, and find that it requires unlikely fine-tuned parameters to work, if at all. In the failed-supernova scenario, most of the yellow supergiant collapsed to form a black hole. Due to the energy carried by neutrinos from the cooling, collapsing core, gravity decreases, leading to the ejection of a small fraction of the outer envelope, some of which remains bound. The fallback accreted gas possesses large angular-momentum fluctuations due to the pre-collapse envelope convection. The fallback material forms intermittent accretion disks around the black hole that launch jets (or disk wind), which unbind most of the bound material. The failed-supernova scenario for M31-2014-DS1 requires that only <1% of the bound material be accreted by the black hole, but the jets do not shut down the backflow for over 10 years. I find this fine-tuned requirement unlikely. I also find that, due to the rapid radiative cooling of the outflow interaction zone with the outer gas, the expected radiation is about an order of magnitude or more above the observed value. These, as well as earlier challenges raised against the failed-supernova scenario, make the alternative type II intermediate-luminosity optical transient scenario, in which fading is due to dust ejection in a violent binary interaction, more likely. The fading event M31-2014-DS1 does not support the failed-supernova scenario predicted by the neutrino-driven explosion mechanism of core-collapse supernovae.