I Choose For You: an Experimental Study
Marina Agranov, Federico Echenique, Kota Saito

TL;DR
This study examines how risk and time preferences change when individuals decide for others versus themselves, using a novel experimental design that incorporates direct costs to reveal genuine trade-offs.
Contribution
Introduces a new 'skin in the game' experimental method that captures heterogeneity and improves behavioral prediction in decision-making for others.
Findings
Participants are more risk-averse and impatient when deciding for others.
The methodology identifies selfish types often missed by standard approaches.
Behavioral consistency and predictive power are improved with the new framework.
Abstract
We investigate whether risk and time preferences differ when individuals make decisions for others compared to making decisions for themselves. We introduce a novel ``skin in the game'' experimental design, where choices for others incur a direct cost to the decision-maker, ensuring a genuine trade-off between self-interest and surrogate allocation. The modal outcome is that participants are more risk-averse and impatient when choosing for others than for themselves. Our methodology reveals significant heterogeneity, successfully identifying selfish types often missed by the more standard ``no skin in the game'' approaches. The message is nuanced, as even non-selfish participants behave differently when they have skin in the game. Furthermore, our framework yields more consistent behavior and superior out-of-sample predictive power.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
