
TL;DR
This paper quantifies the wastefulness of signaling in economic environments, deriving a simple formula for waste ratio in isoelastic cases and exploring its effects beyond.
Contribution
It introduces a formula for the waste ratio in signaling, revealing its dependence on benefit and cost elasticities, applicable to both isoelastic and non-isoelastic environments.
Findings
The waste ratio in isoelastic environments is $eta/(eta+\sigma)$.
The waste ratio is constant across types and independent of cost convexity.
Directional effects of elasticities extend to non-isoelastic environments.
Abstract
Signaling is wasteful. But how wasteful? We study the fraction of surplus dissipated in a separating equilibrium. For isoelastic environments, this waste ratio has a simple formula: , where is the benefit elasticity (reward to higher perception) and is the elasticity of higher types' relative cost advantage. The ratio is constant across types and is independent of other parameters, including convexity of cost in the signal. We show that the directional effects of and on waste extend to non-isoelastic environments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
